E-commerce reconciliation · reference build
A worked example of the MatchPass method applied to multi-source e-commerce reconciliation: commerce activity, connector output, payment processors, wholesale receivables and the bank, reconciled for one synthetic month.
This is a specialist application. For a general spreadsheet workflow, see the Excel workflow demo.
Reference build
Northshore Supply Co. is a fictional company and the dataset is synthetic. Its standard e-commerce accounting workflow has already run. The reference build shows how MatchPass can validate that baseline, investigate the recurring reconciliation work that remains, and route only the items that still require human review.
Reference build · synthetic data
Before · the monthly reconciliation evidence
Build · the MatchPass method
After · synthetic engine output
These results are from the Northshore Supply Co. reference build using synthetic data. The workflow demonstrates the MatchPass method; it is not a client case study or a production result. Production rules and outcomes depend on the client workflow.
Reference build
Northshore Supply Co. is a fictional company and the data is synthetic. It shows how a recurring month-end reconciliation gets turned into documented rules, and where accounting judgment stays with the accounting team.
Existing stack
Standard commerce activity is already posted by the existing connector, and most normal activity closes cleanly. None of that is in question here.
Remaining problem
At each close the accounting team still pulls several sources together and works through substantially the same investigation in a spreadsheet.
Synthetic figures for this reference workflow only. Baseline validated means the existing accounting output agreed with its supporting source evidence, not that MatchPass posted it.
Why this was a candidate for automation
A
Redundant spreadsheet work The same exports were repeatedly combined into one reconciliation workbook.B
Repetitive cadence The investigation ran again each close using substantially the same source types.C
The same questionsD
Repeatable rules Most of the work relied on identifiers, amounts, settlement relationships and approved rollups.E
Judgment was the minority Only a smaller residual population genuinely needed an accountant to decide.Selected rows shown from the larger synthetic monthly evidence set. These are the records the team would otherwise pull together to investigate what still does not tie.
Underlying store activity, before anything reaches the books.
| Payout date | Payout | Order | Gross | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-14 | po_9H2KD4 | #1042 | 1,284.50 | 1,246.95 |
| 2026-03-14 | po_9H2KD4 | #1043 | 96.20 | 93.11 |
| 2026-03-14 | po_9H2KD4 | #1044 | 2,410.00 | 2,339.81 |
| 2026-03-30 | po_9H7RM1 | #1188 | 1,940.00 | 1,883.74 |
| 2026-03-31 | po_9H7RM1 | #1191 | 1,180.00 | 1,145.87 |
| 2026-03-31 | po_9H7RM1 | #1194 | 880.00 | 851.41 |
What the normal accounting workflow already produced.
| Posted | Reference | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14-MAR-26 | po_9H2KD4 | Payout posting | 3,679.87 |
| 18-MAR-26 | po_9H2KD4 | Payout posting | 3,679.87 |
| 14-MAR-26 | ST-K8Q2 | Processor clearing | 2,416.94 |
| 31-MAR-26 | po_9H7RM1 | Payout posting | 3,881.02 |
Settlement and balance activity held outside the store.
| Created | Id | Net | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-14 | ch_3Nx8Ta2eZ | 551.04 | po_1OqPzT |
| 2026-03-14 | ch_3Nx9Cb7rK | 1,006.75 | po_1OqPzT |
| 2026-03-14 | ch_3NxAqD5mW | 859.15 | po_1OqPzT |
| 2026-03-22 | ADJ-7Q2M | 118.60 | adjustment |
| Date | Type | Net |
|---|---|---|
| 03/14/2026 | Checkout | 309.21 |
| 03/14/2026 | Checkout | 144.38 |
| 03/17/2026 | Chargeback | -212.40 |
| 03/17/2026 | Dispute fee | -20.00 |
Invoices and remittances that never touch the storefront.
| Invoice | Customer | Due | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| W-2210 | Harbour Outfitters | 12-MAR-26 | 1,240.00 |
| W-2211 | Harbour Outfitters | 12-MAR-26 | 860.50 |
| W-2214 | Harbour Outfitters | 19-MAR-26 | 412.75 |
| W-2219 | Cedar & Co. | 26-MAR-26 | 688.00 |
| W-2222 | Northline Retail | 27-MAR-26 | 96.20 |
What actually arrived, and when.
| Date | Description | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| 14-MAR-26 | ACH CREDIT SHOPIFY | 3,679.87 |
| 14-MAR-26 | STRIPE TRANSFER ST-K8Q2 | 2,416.94 |
| 16-MAR-26 | PAYPAL INST XFER | 453.59 |
| 20-MAR-26 | EFT HARBOUR OUTFITTERS | 2,513.25 |
| 28-MAR-26 | ACH CREDIT | 96.20 |
| 02-APR-26 | ACH CREDIT SHOPIFY | 3,881.02 |
An accounting-side view of the existing books, not a separate source dataset.
| Date | Type | Reference | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22-MAR-26 | Correction | JE-0441 | 118.60 |
Why the existing books are ingested too. MatchPass validates the existing accounting output against the supporting source evidence before applying the workflow's custom reconciliation rules. That is what makes the baseline trustworthy, and it is what lets a duplicate posting be identified rather than assumed. This is the architecture for this synthetic workflow, not a requirement for every implementation.
These are high-level rule families configured for the synthetic Northshore workflow. Production rules are tailored to each approved client process. Open any rule to see a business-level example of what it settled.
The accounting team starts with 24 evidence-backed review items instead of rebuilding a 173-item investigation in a spreadsheet.
Representative items shown from the full synthetic residual population.
MatchPass automates repeatable reconciliation logic. The accounting team retains judgment, classification and approval. Nothing here is posted to an accounting system automatically, and no rule chooses an accounting treatment on its own.
Before MatchPass
After MatchPass
Northshore Supply Co. is a fictional example. The workflow demonstrates how MatchPass can structure a recurring reconciliation process. Production rules and results vary by client, and every figure shown here comes from a synthetic dataset we generated ourselves. It is not a client case study or a production result. Designed to complement standard e-commerce accounting connectors rather than replace them.
Related
Describe the workflow and the sources involved. No files or preparation are needed for the initial conversation.